| http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#value | - tnote 6, the Rash court specifically noted that creditors should not receive ???portions of the retail price, if any, that reflect the value of items the debtor does not receive when he retains his vehicle, items such as warranties, inventory storage, and reconditioning.??? 19 Congress enacted ?? 506(a)(2) to codify Rash, incorporating the ???replacement value??? concept for chapter 7 and 13 cases
|
