| http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#value | - It is surprising that Russell is honoured with first having seen the distinction, inasmuch as he is also famous for not (or never, I am not sure) having understood the significance of G??del's incompleteness results - arguably a reason for the latter is that Russell was a logician for whom logical languages were real languages. (There is a very interesting question here about the relation between
|
