| http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#value | - It is further to be noted that, according to decision T 841/95 of 13 June 1993 (cf. the Headnote and points 2.3 to 2.3.2.4 of the reasons), where a claim for an apparatus seeks to define the invention by reference to features of the use to which the apparatus is to be put, a lack of clarity can result; however, if the subject-matter of the application is an apparatus and it is not viable to define
|
