| http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#value | - the defendant raises a substantial question concerning infringement)).) Apple opposed the motion, principally relying on the fact that it would be filing post-trial motions with respect to the Galaxy Tab 10.1 (which will not be resolved until at least December) and that it intended to seek an injunction based on the jury???s finding that one version of the Galaxy Tab 10.1 infringed certain utility
|
