| http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#value | - If getting drunk exonerates the companies from a duty to warn, should not other forms of negligence by, in this case the parents, also be considered in the determination of whether any failure to warn was a direct and proximate cause of the injury? 8.) Even assuming a duty to warn such as the one proposed, wasn't the parents' failure to ensure that their son was wearing a pfd a superceeding and int
|
