| http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#value | - If he can not come forward with any plausible efficiency-enhancing argument, then in fact per se condemnation may be appropriate, but at that point when the plaintiff meets his burden of going forward and showing that there is some anticompetitive impact, then the defendant should be given the opportunity to say why he engaged in this conduct, and if in fact there is a plausible argument for it, the
|
