| http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#value | - My interpretation of her candid response is that she is disappointed that her letter published by JAMA and other reviews ( see KMT - Dennis Forbes) and expressions of support have not killed any belief that KV55 is Akenhaten.She tells me that it is correct that, prior to the recent CT scanning of Hawass et al, the last person withexpertise in human osteology and paleopathology to examine the KV55
|
