| http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#value | - decided, was an improper exercise of the developer's amendment power.</p><p>Anderson conceded that Oak Run Associates ??? as its lawyer maintained ??? had spelled out how it would handle the other services such as security and cable TV that had been covered in the main covenants but then dealt with individually after the amendment.</p><p>Here, the appellate judges determined that Oak Run Associa
|
