| http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#value | - The court felt it had been a little bit conned into believing that the offense charged was an isolated incident, and had since learned that there were possibly as many as 82 occasions on which appellant had performed some legal services for persons involved with the INS. The court acknowledged that there was "some clue to the true situation in the presentence report, but felt it was fairly obl
|
