| http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#value | - While Dimock (English Historical Review, 1894, pp. 440-472) denies his innocence on the ground that he kept the negotiations secret, historians such as Major Hume (Treason and Plot, pp. 115-152, New York, 1901) considers his guilt unproved, as he had been permitted to make similar false suggestions with the connivance of Walsingham in 1590. [7]
|
