| http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#value | - They just mechanically reject everything as obvious if they can find the pieces in any prior art, regardless of whether it was obvious to put them together (and for those who think this is a good thing, the result of this line is there is no such thing as an invention, because everybody builds on what is already there).And now with Bilski, the examiners are all hot to reject any software claim as no
|
