| http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#value | - I rather agree that I think that infliction of emotion distress, by speech alone may not be a tort.It would have the very bad side effect that almost anyone could claim it, even if the speech is just offensive to their sensibilities.And, there is a chance that, in this particular case, WBC is so hated that SCOTUS (or at least some of the justices) will decide this solely on the basis of who the defend
|
