| http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#value | - The FPC rejected proposed tariff 12.3 and declined to interpret the substitute fuel clauses, reasoning those actions were unnecessary because [i]mplementation of the curtailment plan itself, pursuant to our procedures, would be an absolute defense for United against all claims for specific performance, damages, or other requests for relief ... that may be initiated in the courts. 46 FPC at 805.
|
