| http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#value | - by PeterM from Berkeley (15510) writes: Yes, you are quite right, some beef is fed on grass, and that beef is healthier to eat, and people can not digest grass.And some grass fields are not arable no matter what, while others are irrigated and could be used for crops instead, which people could eat.it is a complicated picture and yes, excuse me for over-simplifying: grain-fed beef is an energy loser, g
|
