| http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#value | - The focus of the court's analysis was whether the contract, in which the duty to indemnify was tied to the subcontractor's negligence, required the subcontractor to provide a defense to a suit against the developer even if the subcontractor was not negligent. (See id. at p. 560.) Crawford held that Weather Shield's express contractual duty to defend suits `founded upon' the kinds of claims specif
|
