| http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#value | - it as collateral security???on 8th April Elkington produced a statement of claim???there was no counter-claim???the defence was that part of the work done by him was not done for Elkington, and admitting that he had paid 120l., and not 106l. only, and denying that he paid the work set out, on account, but for work actually done???there was a reply to that on 18th April, 1879, and a rejoinder in
|
