PropertyValue
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type
http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#value
  • It follows that there is no room for any further investigation, i.e. there is no reason to require a sworn statement from Appellant O2, nor can his opposition be rejected as inadmissible.The opposition of Appellant O2 and consequently the appeal is therefore admissible.2.
http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#wasQuotedFrom
  • epo.org