| http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#value | - On Friday 09 October 2009 at 15:52 David wrote ???We???ve established that there is a VERY small risk with upper cervical manipulation (so small that it???s proving hard to measure and is not a risk that applies to the vast majority of the population), but are you suggesting that there are substantial risks with manipulation in the low-back????
|
