| http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#value | - In Sable Communications v FCC, the Court noted that there is a compelling interest in protecting the physical and psychological well-being of minors . . . [by] . . . shielding minors from the influence of literature that is not obscene by adult standards, 22 and ACLU did not contradict this. 23 One might still argue, of course, that this interest extends not to all patently offensive description
|
