| http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#value | - In fact in US. v. Knox, the court specifically held that: ...Clothing alone did not automatically mean that images of children were legal.There is a six prong test emanating from the case US v. Dost, which calls for the court to individually look into each case to determine if the poses render the pictures of a clothed child permissible or not.Nevertheless, First Amendment Lawyers are uncomforta
|
