| http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#value | - Writing for himself, Ruffin, and Justice Joseph J. Daniel, Justice Gaston reasoned that, had the homicide been committed by free man upon free man, it could have been no more than manslaughter; if between master and apprentice, the deed could have been attributed to a brief fury that did not leave the mind capable of the sort of calm, rational thought required for murder.
|
