| http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#value | - QuoteHow does the 100 macro compare, considering it is not an L?[a href=\index.php?act=findpost&pid=59537\][{POST_SNAPBACK}][/a]Well, I have the 24-105 f4/L, 17-40 f4/L and the 200 f2.8 L/II. I would say it is sharper than all of them particularly wide open.It would make a good portrait lens, since the bokeh is nice and smooth too - the only thing I would be worried about there is that it might be a littl
|
