| http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#value | - John Ballay was alleged to be mentally ill and, because of that illness, . . . likely to injure himself or other persons if allowed to remain at liberty . . . .2 The jury was instructed that it must be convinced by a preponderance of the evidence that both elements were present, a standard of proof which has been consistently applied by force of case law.3 The question is whether appellant was d
|
