PropertyValue
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type
http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#value
  • Now my position is that the Holy Spirit proceeded exactly at the same time as the Logos was begotten, and in that case both understandings (filloque or no) are true.Technically it is Arianism to say time because that would imply that there was a time when the Holy Spirit did not proceed and a time that the Son was not begotten.
http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#wasQuotedFrom
  • orthodoxchristianity.net