| http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#value | - Hinkle countered Florida???s claim that defining marriage is a state issue, pointing out that its suggestion ???that this is just a federalism case ??? that the state???s laws are beyond review in federal court ??? is a nonstarter.??? Further, he pointed out that 20 of the 22 plaintiffs were couples who married in other states. ???The defendants do not explain why, if a state???s laws on marriage
|
