| http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#value | - Digby???s claim was that 1) his cure was powder and not salve, hence is suited for corpuscular explanation prevalent at his time, and that 2) unlike its counter-part, i.e. Weapon-Salve, it has been used for over 20 years with success.[43] The way in which its efficacy is proved is by Digby???s personal anecdote in 1624, where he allegedly cured the wound of a gentleman by the name of James Howell.
|
