| http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#value | - Instead, the Court has historically and consistently held that, ???[f]irst, the exclusionary rule is not an individual right and applies only where it ???result[s] in appreciable deterrence.??????[2] ???We have repeatedly rejected the argument that exclusion is a necessary consequence of a fourth amendment violation.???[3] The rule, instead, is to be deployed after a constitutional violation has b
|
