| http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#value | - On June 21, 2006, the Director of National Intelligence (???DNI???) asserted the state secrets privilege in this case, and the Defendants moved to dismiss or, in the alternative, for summary judgment, on the grounds that evidence protected by the state secrets privilege is necessary to litigate this case, including in particular whether or not the Plaintiffs had been subject to alleged warrantless
|
