| http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#value | - Once this burden is met, the onus of proof is reversed and it is the complaining party that must prove that there is a reasonably available, less restrictive alternative for the regulating member; otherwise the measure will be found to meet the necessity test. [FN348] With respect to what is a ???reasonably available??? less restrictive alternative, the AB has opined: ???[a]n alternative measure m
|
