| http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#value | - In the absence of such evidence the Board considers that the problem was solved over the whole range of Claim 1.The appellant also objected that the scope of the claim embraced modes of execution of the prior art such as the use of a stabilizing agent of the bleach, eg an exotherm control agent, or the absorption of the perfume on a carrier eg on starch or sugar.This argument cannot be accepted by
|
