| http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#value | - In that Order, the court found that statements in the shared specification of the Ormco patents, the prosecution history of the ???562 patent, the prosecution history of the abandoned 07/775,589 application (of which the ???432 patent is a continuation-in-part), and the prosecution history of the ???432 patent limited the claims of the Ormco patents to a process in which final treatment positions
|
