| http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#value | - In construing all the facts and inferences in favor of Holmes, we conclude there is a question of fact as to whether McKay is USF&G's agent so that her representations regarding coverage for the migrant workers' claims are binding on USF&G. III. USF&G also argues that, because Holmes settled a civil suit alleging intentional acts on his part, any claim to coverage is void as contrary to public pol
|
