| http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#value | - On appeal, McIntosh contends principally that: (1) the district court erred in declining to instruct the jurors that they must unanimously agree as to one specific method???i.e., whether he ???forcibly assault[ed], resist[ed], oppose[d], impede[d], intimidate [d], or interfere[d] with??? a federal officer, see 18 U.S.C. ?? 111(a)???by which McIntosh violated ?? 111(a), so as to support his convict
|
