| http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#value | - Since on the date of issue of the warrant by the President of India, respondent no.9 was not qualified to be appointed as Judge of the High Court, his appointment would be quashed and the Union of India and other respondents would not administer him oath or affirmation under Article 219 of the Constitution of India. [p.145F-G] S.P. Gupta and others v. Union of India & Ors., [1982] 2 SCR 365, cited
|
