| http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#value | - The underlying implication is that the so-called qualified reviewer has an agenda and a non-objective bias.http://www.signatureinthecell.com/responses/response-to-darrel-falk.phpReplyDeleteHavokJuly 23, 2011 at 9:06 PMRick: It has also been validated by leading atheistic sources:Nagel is neither a biochemist, nor a biologist, and therefore does not seem particularly qualified to assess the argument
|
