| http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#value | - The differences in the narratives seem to show that Luke didn't have knowledge of Matthew.Had it only been recorded by Matthew with his fondness for the Old Testament, it would make perfect sense as a narrative added later on, but Luke has been shown accurate in many areas so I think the case for historicity can be made.Mark is a gospel far more interested in what Jesus did, I do not think we can r
|
