| http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#value | - The courts were most hesitant to recognise shock as a kind of damage in its own right, and even after repudiating the need for contemporaneous physical impact retained, for a time, the requirement that the plaintiff must be within the area of possible injury by impact . . . rather than by shock--a theory which has been labelled the 'impact theory. . . .'
|
