| http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#value | - he is definitional to mock piety.DeleteReplyPaul1/02/2013 5:56 PMEd,The view that Romans 1 is not universal has the potential to lead to the denial that Romans 2 and 3 is universal language as well.Yawn, even if it does have this potential, that does not imply that it has this potential when conjoined with *other* beliefs, such as the ones I pointed out.
|
