| http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#value | - Regrettably though, the Literature Search, that the Science Panel based its Policy Recommendation of 39??? SLR / 2100 on, was a one sided selection of Pro AGW and Pro SLR reports. ( Although, considering that the NOAA ???No Regrets??? office in Charleston, is paying scientists millions to prove SLR and AGW, it???s not surprising that there???s lots of Pro AGW and SLR literature.)
|
