| http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#value | - The IPKat suspects that the CJEU is using the Painer case to reinforce the notion that Infopaq, and in particular paragraph 35 of that decision, was indeed talking about substantive requirements for originality, about questions of novelty or merit such as requiring that the work results from creative choices, or that the work expresses the author's personality.
|
