| http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#value | - A restraining notice was served on a bank, the bank failed to restrain the debtor's account - because the account was not in the name of the debtor- it was in the name of a corporation (which as it turns out the debtor owned)- the creditor who served the restraining notice sued the bank- and in his suit specifically claimed that the corporation was a sham, and the bank should have known that since
|
