| http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#value | - The case involves whether reverse-payment agreements are per se lawful unless the underlying patent litigation was a sham or the patent was obtained by fraud (as the court below held), or instead are presumptively anticompetitive and unlawful (as the Third Circuit has held).The Professors??? brief argues that exclusion-payment settlements fly in the face of not only antitrust law and the regulator
|
