| http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#value | - The Court explained that the ???[u]nconscionability doctrine ensures that contracts, particularly contracts of adhesion, do not impose terms that have been variously described as ???overly harsh,?????? ???unduly oppressive,?????????so one-sided as to shock the conscience,?????? or ???unfairly one-sided.??? All of these formulations point to the central idea that [the] unconscionability doctrine is
|
