| http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#value | - This included: (1) highly prejudicial statements about the DEA???s investigation of Walker; (2) information the agent developed that ???corroborated??? Walker???s guilt, such as hearsay reports from other agents that drug customers had implicated Walker; (3) lengthy testimony that cooperating witnesses and other informants had confirmed Walker???s involvement in drug dealing, again, all of which w
|
