| http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#value | - This finding was upheld on appeal. ______ states that ???the [c]ourt???s holding was based on the fact that there was no indication that the plaintiffs did not consent to use of their Social Security benefits to satisfy their costs, and thus no execution, levy, attachment, garnishment or other legal process was present to trigger a ??407(a) violation.??? ______ ignores a fundamental piece of the c
|
