PropertyValue
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type
http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#value
  • The ARRL would not appreciate it if we just used W1AW and completely ignored the /4, especially since there is more than one W1AW/x operating at the same time.Here is the best solution I can think of for W1AW/4 teams that want to try JT65, let me know if you have a better idea:* Use MultiPSK (which has JT65 mode) instead of JT65-HF, which has less flexibility with free text.* Under Configuration >
http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#wasQuotedFrom
  • eham.net