| http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#value | - The Miller decision implied (though didn???t explicitly say) that the court believed that the 2nd Amendment protected the sort of weapons which would be of use to the military or for the ???common defense.??? It is easily shown (though it was not so shown to that court) that a short-barrelled shotgun is indeed ???ordinary military equipment,??? and obviously could contribute to the common defense.
|