| http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#value | - The arguments we made were basically these: first, that the term ???exhibition,??? which was the key term in the statute that was at issue in that case, a question of whether there was a lascivious exhibition of the pertinent body parts even though those body parts were covered in the films that were involved??? we argued, as the third circuit had held, that the term ???exhibition??? did not neces
|
