| http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#value | - Thus the product and process of the alleged invention were indistinguishable from these disclosures.Even if the alleged invention were to be regarded as novel over the disclosure of these two documents, such as on the basis either that the rate of cooling specified in Claim 8 was not disclosed as such, or that the degree of homogenisation would not have been sufficient to have brought all the prec
|
