| http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#value | - Plaintiff did not dispute the facts submitted by AIG. Instead, Plaintiff argued that, since Granite was a subsidiary of AIG and Granite had sufficient contacts with Oklahoma, those contacts should be imputed to AIG. The Plaintiff argued that AIG exercised control over Granite and therefore, Granite???s contact with Oklahoma should be sufficient to establish jurisdiction over AIG.
|
